American Morning

Tune in at 6am Eastern for all the news you need to start your day.
September 11th, 2009
11:39 AM ET

Vigilance or luck? No attacks on U.S. soil since 9/11

By Stephen Samaniego

Eight years ago today the United States was attacked in what was the worst terrorist attack in the nation's history. Since that day America's leaders have been warning the country that an attack on U.S. soil is imminent.

In January 2002, during President Bush's first State of the Union address, he said "Thousands of dangerous killers, schooled in the methods of murder, often supported by outlaw regimes, are now spread throughout the world like ticking time bombs, set to go off without warning."

Vice President Cheney followed the president's warning a few months later in May saying, "I think that the prospects of a future attack on the U.S. are almost a certainty. It could happen tomorrow, it could happen next week, it could happen next year, but they will keep trying."

America watched nervously, anticipating the worst but no attack came. Since that sunny September morning 8 years ago the United States has been able to stay safe – but how?

Immediately after the attacks the U.S. government took drastic measures to beef up its national security. President Bush created the Department of Homeland Security to streamline its efforts and appointed former Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge to head the department. According to Ridge, the creation of this department was one of the best things the Bush administration did to help fight terrorism. "I think the ripple effect of creating the department has resulted in a security platform that most Americans don't see on a day to day basis but I know exists."

With the creation of the department came more communication between the federal, state and local governments. New rules and regulations allowed these agencies to work as a team. "Remember right after 911 everyone said nobody connected the dots," says Ridge. "Well I'm here to tell you there are a lot more dots because there is a lot more intelligence coming in."

The Department of Homeland Security identified that one of our country's weakest links was our border control. To help seal the borders DHS gave U.S. Custom and Border agents the discretion to deny entrance to people they felt could be terrorists.

In 2003, a Jordanian man named Raed al-Banna was attempting to enter the country in Chicago. While he was being questioned by a U.S. Customs agent, he was explaining that he had a visa to travel between Jordan and the U.S. legally but when the agent questioned how he had supported himself during lengthy stays in America he admitted that he had worked odd jobs in Los Angeles. Working in the U.S. without a green card is not allowed so al-Banna was fingerprinted and deported.

A year and a half later, a suicide attack in Hilla, Iraq killed 166 people. When authorities were combing through the rubble they found a severed hand chained to the steering wheel of the vehicle the suicide bomber drove. They ran the prints and the bomber was identified as al-Banna.

National Security authorities were not only concerned about al Qaeda soldiers infiltrating the United States but also their ideas taking hold. With a large Muslim population in this country there was an overwhelming fear that Osama bin Laden's ideology might appeal to some creating home-grown terrorists. Terrorism expert Brian Jenkins of the RAND corporation says there are two reasons that this has not happened.

"America's Muslim population, those to whom al Qaeda would appeal its exhortation to carry out actions, have simply not been receptive to his calls for violence," says Jenkins. "In fact as a community, they have been hostile to his brand of terrorism."

Secondly, he says that the lack of competency has played a central role in authorities catching home-grown terrorists before they have a chance to act. Jenkins cautions, " has to be careful with this. The difference between a band of amateurs being able to do nothing and a small group being able to carry out a dangerous terrorist attack is having one determined technically competent leader."

New York City has been the target of eight attempted terrorist attacks since 9/11, according to New York City police officials. All have failed but New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly reminds us, "'s important to put it in context and it's not for lack of trying." The target for most of the attacks has been so-called soft targets such as the Brooklyn Bridge, the subway system and a Jewish synagogue. These are places considered vulnerable because they lack the high security of high profile targets like the Statue of Liberty and the Empire State building.

Most terrorism experts agree that complacency is the nation's biggest challenge and it is important to remain vigilant. While our government has committed billions of dollars and thousands of people to keeping this country safe, Brian Jerkins looks to the American people as a whole to stand up to terrorism.

"Ultimately the defense of this country is going to rest upon the courage of our individual citizens being realistic about risk, being committed to the values for which this nation stands and has stood for more than two centuries."

Filed under: Spies Among Us • Terrorism
soundoff (7 Responses)
  1. PNUT

    You'd be amazed at how many would be / will be terrorists and terrorist supporters live and thrive in the U.S. Muslim communities. They love to use our freedom against us to advance their islamist agendas. between the islamists and our own fundamentalists we'll be back in the stone ages or all blown up before too long. The best thing that we could do to save humanity is to outlaw religion ! If you can't prove it, you can't preach it !!

    October 25, 2009 at 11:38 pm |
  2. Richard Abbey.

    Of course the American President knew an attack was imminent, It was pre-planned 3 years before the event. Dean Warwick was not murdered because he was lying, he was the intelligence whistle blower shot on stage before he could open his mouth to the world the real truth of this conspiracy. And I have that recording he made to an American journalist.

    October 14, 2009 at 11:32 am |
  3. John

    The largest threat to America is Rush Limbaugh. While terorist kill individuals, Limbaugh is destroying America.

    October 14, 2009 at 9:31 am |
  4. Xavier

    I can say my name is Xavier, and I' addicted to Cnn.
    l'll hav to agree with mike from tx. We did have 8 years
    of harmony. I really miss the days where I woke up in
    the morning and didn't run to the tv to see if we
    were hit with another terrorist act. With our new President
    whos name i won't mention cause I am really sick of
    hearing it. I worry about the next four years. He seems
    too soft to be the President of The United States of America,
    We have the strongest most professional military in the world.
    I would like it very much if it stayed that way... Horrible timing
    on cutting out the ballistic missle system in Europe. Not very smart
    Mr. President. And you do that after you've already known for years that the Iranians have been building and functioning an underground
    nuclar facility... I don't want ANY civilian casualties, but i really hope Israel has their way with th Iranian military.

    September 30, 2009 at 8:55 am |
  5. ggreenwood4

    This is "Not" Meant to be anymore than a factual statement .... But if our Major Security Threats come from Islam / Muslims then the only REAL SOLUTION is to 'EJECT" all Islamics / Muslims from our shores! "DO NOT" allow any of them inside our borders for ANY reason. With them locked out no more problems with Islamic Converts, Sleeper Cells or Individual Terrorists attacking this country from within. This is a VERY HARD but FIRM and Realistic Solution. Wake up America, this "IS" what it's going to take to really be safe within our borders. Also we must Incarcerate, Deport, Exile or otherwise deal with "Domestic Terrorist Organizations" ie: "STREET GANGS" that suborn Terroism from within our borders by buying and distributing drugs (Heroin) coming from places like Afganistan!

    September 23, 2009 at 1:18 pm |
  6. Chuck Hood

    If we don't get control of the borders WE WILL have a serious problem. Look at the situation that is unfolding as we discuss this problem. NOW CONTROLLING THE BORDERS IS SOMETHING TO "GET MAD AS HELL" not the second amendment...... is the border problem just not news worthy?.........

    September 22, 2009 at 9:18 am |
  7. Mike Armstrong TX.

    Scare tacktics For eight years we lived in harmony after 9-11 under Bush control because we knew that we had a gun slinging president now in the past year we have had two self inflicted scares by our new government what other surprises can we exspect from our new democratic leaders the competency of sound judgement is definitly in question hear should they stay or should they go ?

    September 12, 2009 at 11:24 pm |